As I've been saying for a while, destroying greenfields in exurbs is a business model that is slowing down and may end for a long time.
A symptom of this is the announcement of the end of Big Builder Magazine.
If there are any Big Builder types thinking of what next to do with their lives, here's an idea:
Start a land bank in SW Denver, where there are hundreds of homes available for $50k to $100k. These prices don't seem to be going up any time very soon, but they are very competitive with the cost of greenfield lots. Throw in the fact that they are eight times closer to the jobs and entertainment of Denver's city center, and you start to think they may eventually be worth a lot more than those far-flung lots.
Now add in some recent pro-density changes in Denver's zoning code, and you have a pretty compelling business model.
A symptom of this is the announcement of the end of Big Builder Magazine.
If there are any Big Builder types thinking of what next to do with their lives, here's an idea:
Start a land bank in SW Denver, where there are hundreds of homes available for $50k to $100k. These prices don't seem to be going up any time very soon, but they are very competitive with the cost of greenfield lots. Throw in the fact that they are eight times closer to the jobs and entertainment of Denver's city center, and you start to think they may eventually be worth a lot more than those far-flung lots.
Now add in some recent pro-density changes in Denver's zoning code, and you have a pretty compelling business model.
